Asset Allocation Monthly

Asset Allocation Monthly

In a game of cards “standing pat” is to retain one’s hand as dealt, without drawing other cards. Standing pat also captures how we have managed our asset allocation in recent months, making few changes to our overall preferences. We continue to believe the best risk-adjusted returns will come from equities and corporate credit over the next 12-18 months, with persistent caution on core duration, and we are neutral towards cash, commodities and UK commercial property.

Figure 1: volatility-adjusted returns, January 1998 – May 2021

Annualised ytd may 21 graph

Source: Bloomberg, May 2021

More itinerant returns from financial markets in the first five months of the year have largely supported this positioning. Volatility-adjusted returns, or “Sharpe ratios”, have been punchy and well above respective medians and means in equities (and commodities), but exceedingly poor for long-duration fixed income assets, particularly government bonds (Figure 1)1. We have discussed ad nauseum why we judge developed market government bonds to be a remarkably poor source of return diversification – and with yields still historically low, locking in similarly low prospective returns, and growing fiscal profligacy, we take duration exposure sparingly across asset allocation funds.

Our allocations “under the bonnet” of broad asset class categories have been less fruitful, in two chief areas. First, in pointing our cyclical equity exposure towards Asian EM and Japan, which have lagged notably behind the UK and Europe; and second, in continuing to favour equally high-yield and high-grade corporate bonds, where returns have differed wildly. Let’s take a look at each in turn.

Kicking the tyres on equity regions

Underwhelming performance from Japan and emerging Asia has been surprising given the heightened sensitivity of earnings to global industrial production and exposure to cyclicals. For instance, “betas” of earnings to global industrial production in both regions are twice what they are in Europe and the UK2, helped by the more cyclical composition of Asian markets compared with the rest of the world. In each case, however, softer participation in cyclical rallies is explained by idiosyncratic factors – a combination of fresh waves of Covid-19, unhelpful domestic flows (underpinned by typical seasonal caution from Japanese equity analysts), and concerns of sharp policy tightening from Chinese policymakers in the second half of 2020.

While the latter would almost certainly be widely disruptive for risk assets, our expectations are for only a metered tightening: the authorities learned their lesson from previous over-tightening in 2017 and 2018, and our Asian equity colleagues welcome the improved quality of Chinese growth and earnings as a result of recent measures. With strong, above-consensus earnings expected both this year and next – Asia and Japan are expected to comfortably deliver double-digit compounded earnings growth between 2020 and 2022 that is several turns greater than Europe or the UK – and at a globally competitive price, we have maintained exposures in weaker markets (Figure 2).

We also stay constructive on US equities, where strength in the first quarter earnings season has been fairly astonishing. Earnings for S&P 500 companies have grown by 50% year-on-year, more than twice the (elevated) expected 24%; unusually, analysts have been marking up forecasts as the quarter progressed. As in the last quarter, the market has used this reporting season as an opportunity to post modest total return gains and to also derate. S&P 500 revenues are 10% higher compared with a year ago, against expectations of 6%, and our US equity colleagues point to upside risks to both revenues and earnings growth for the year as a whole.

Figure 2: What do you pay for earnings growth?

What does profit growth cost

Source: Citi research, Worldscope, MSCI, Factset, 24 May 2021. Red marks our favoured regions. Note: the above data are compiled based on companies in the MSCI AC World Index. The market capitalisation for regions, markets and sectors are free-float adjusted. P/E, EPS Growth, P/B, Dividend Yield and ROE are aggregated from Factset consensus.

Drilling deeper into grades of credit

Total returns from high yield and high grade corporate bonds have also diverged meaningfully this year. To a degree this is driven by duration, which has fared poorly and impacts longer-maturity high grade much more than shorter-duration high yield. But it is also explained by differing underlying trends in risk. If one scales exposures across markets for the same level 12-month volatility (of, for example, the S&P 500), then high grade bonds have generated the best risk-adjusted returns by some distance – above both equities and high yield bonds (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Total returns, scaled by trailing 12-month volatility, 2002-2021

Vol levered graph

Source: Bloomberg, 24 May 2021. To create ‘same risk’ time series, scale exposures across markets so that each asset class volatility = 12-month SPX vol. Repeat next month, etc

After a weak first quarter, high grade bonds have treaded water, and given continued central bank support and significant improvements in underlying corporate fundamentals, we hold steady. We continue to direct our investments towards the excess spread offered by shorter-maturity European high yield bonds – which may be in a sweet spot from policy support, ongoing cyclical upswing and improving credit metrics, including dramatically lower default expectations for both this year and next, with higher expected recovery rates to boot.

Figure 4: Asset allocation snapshot

Asset allocation strongly dislike table

Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investment, 24 May 2021

20 September 2018
Share article
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Key topics
Related topics
Listen on stitcher badge
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Key topics
Related topics

Important information

The research and analysis included on this website has been produced by Columbia Threadneedle Investments for its own investment management activities, may have been acted upon prior to publication and is made available here incidentally. Any opinions expressed are made as at the date of publication but are subject to change without notice and should not be seen as investment advice. Information obtained from external sources is believed to be reliable but its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed.

Related Insights

18 August 2022

Joe Horrocks-Taylor

Senior Associate, Analyst, Responsible Investment

Jet zero – how investors can get on board for the long haul of aviation decarbonisation

Aviation is a large emitter of carbon. We explore the options, including sustainable aviation fuels.
Read time - 4 min
9 June 2022

ESG knowledge shared: June 2022

Keep up to date with responsible investing in our monthly roundup of highlights – interesting events, articles we’re reading, podcasts and more.
Read time - 4 min
17 May 2022

Marcus Wilert

Vice President, Analyst Responsible Investment

Searching for solutions: an update on bee-harming pesticides

Read our update on the controversial use of bee-harming pesticides in agriculture – and whether there are any suitable solutions.
Read time - 5 min